I think this book is mostly narratives. It puts lots of scene descriptives that are irrelavant to the issue under discussion (such as how long a corridor is for someone walked on someday), which make it moch closer to film scripts, and far far away from objective, systematic analysis of the Financial Crisis.
It is more of "telling you a story as if you were in the scene", but you can never ensure whether what you got is comprehensive emough or not so you should go to another source of information - if your true motive is to understand what (lots of things) really happened in multiple aspects in the marcoeconomics.
