pg 68 talks about empowering women so they will have less kids ( abortion? )
Even more controversial is the assertion on pages 256-257, where May and Caron argue that people who question global warming orthodoxy should be excluded from media coverage of the issue. But Later, they claim that, "Giving both sides equal coverage creates the inaccurate perception that it's an equally weighted debate." "Because journalists are supposed to give both sides of the story, sometimes they actually create a bias in their reporting," they say. Later, they claim that, "Giving both sides equal coverage creates the inaccurate perception that it's an equally weighted debate."
They also say: "Although `balanced' reporting might seem fair, the likelihood that humans are contributing to climate change is 95 percent certain." So typical of the type, you can talk if I want to hear what you have to say, other wise shut up.
They will steer you away from books they don't like page 266.
They hate Nuclear power page 222. ( but that don't emit carbon? )
and kiwi fruit pg 90 ( has to be shipped in.)
Pg 90 also condemns product packaging, especially bubble rap and kiwi fruit ( has to be shipped in.)
On pg 39 good old h20 causes 60 percent of the planet's warming??
for us Dummies that is water
On pg 156 they are into rasing yor taxs
Elizabeth May is in the Canada Green party looking for face time and you money. In 10 yrs she will me screaming about the next Ice age and we are all going to starve as the glassier comes down ( look up the 60s and 70s and global cooling.)