I don't mind



* what they research

* what kind of fund they receive and research,



as long as the experiments and influence doesn't undermine

my own freedom.



In this arena, there are three parties:



* Pure Interested Researchers,

* Funder,

* and Victims.



Dr. Moreno juggled himself where he stands

through his book, is it important? No -

I have been a victim for 15 years.

What they do,



1) Under wireless MEDUSA,

which says every 5-6 seconds, 24/7 commanding me what to do.

(all these you can turn around and see the direction of the sound

coming.)



2) Fire the pulsed directed energy at me,

(my skin vibrates it. PPS(pulsed periodic stimuli) which

caused internal breeding while urination.)



3) while in the sleep period, they fired the words



-----> We will kill your family.



repeatedly and loudly, which caused the alternating

the dream.



4) while I was in bed for resting, the infra-wave fired

at my body and I felt I was floating on the sea water wave.

when my head goes up, my abdomen areas goes down.

I love this experiences but they never repeated.



5) Recently, they asked while I was supposed to be in sleep,

"Everything is finished except the visual perception part."

asking what I do know : They call it secret.



I myself studied neuroscience for two years.

So, I can be researcher side as well as victim's side.

Researcher's side could complain I have done nothing wrong.

And it is the right argument. However, now they have

just begun to learn the effect of what they have done.

That's good news.



The major agonizing issue is what the researchers did

is affecting the freedom in a great deal to the people in

the rest of the world.



All things are done REMOTELY and WITHOUT CONSENT.



The most interesting question that I would like to raise

is to the researcher,



To the funder, you are an asset to protect.

Once you are no longer an interesting asset,

never forget, in any minute, your place can

be switched from the observer of the remote human

experiment to the human lab-rats.



Can researcher's side possibly imagine it?

When funders think they are no longer useful as a

researcher... Perhaps, using another researcher's work,

the funder could kill remotely, but looked like a natural

death. I question what would be the last word of just

murdered researcher...